Have you read the City of Cape Town’s contentious new electricity strategy? We now have until 31 May to comment, so please speak up! We received a letter from energy specialist David Lipschitz, who had the following to say about this plan…
I am praying that someone can find the space to get this discussion into the open so that it is understood and discussed so that South Africa can take its rightful place in the top 10 growing countries in the world.
I have downloaded and read the Cape Town electricity strategy, which is available here.
I am very disappointed, but why? It has become very obvious to me that this government (both ANC and DA) does not want private renewable energy production. And this even though every single person and organisation buying electricity paid 2 cents per kWh levy to SARS on our electricity bills for two years and for the past 2 years have been paying 3.5 cents per kWh. And this will be increased to 4.5 cents per kWh in July.
Over R20 billion collected to pay Feed In Tariffs (FITs) for Renewable Energy Production, but no willingness by government to actually use these taxes for the purpose we are paying them. The same goes for the plastic bag tax and the car emissions taxes. Then we’ll have the carbon tax from 2015 and all for the single purpose of collecting more tax!
With no wish to implement Renewable Energy as envisioned in the 1998 and 2003 government White Papers, ie government strategy.
Now you might look at the big Independent Power Producer (IPP) Photovoltaic and Wind Turbine projects and say that the government IS doing something, but all this is simply to meet its minimum responsibility so that it can continue to tap international financing, and to keep control in the ANC government owned monopoly, Eskom, and its government owned coal suppliers. The White Papers mentioned talk about 30% ownership of the electricity production by 2010 and allow for things like Feed In Tariffs, Net Metering and Time of Use Tariffs for small users.
At the moment Time of Use Tariffs, ie charging different amount of money at different times of the day and at different times of the year, costs R6,000 a day service fee in the City of Cape Town! So this is for big people only and as usual in South Africa, the small person is left in the cold.
IPPs aren’t really independent. The only thing that is independent is that the finance is not arranged by government. But government still has to enter into a long term payment contract with the IPP, in effect providing a Feed In Tariff, which the government said was illegal in 2011!
When a Coal Power Station is built, the government has to provide Eskom with Loan Guarantees, effectively providing a Feed In Tariff for 30 years so that the Coal Power Station can be built and so that the financiers know they will get their money. Yet Feed In Tariffs are illegal for the private home owner, SMME and normal business owner!!
It is not only the ANC which is at fault. In 2011, the DA government in the Western Cape introduced a Net Metering tariff, but has made it impossible to get by over-regulating – something the Italian government also did. Likewise when the DA introduced Feed In Tariffs in the 1990’s, it was made impossible for us, because of too many regulations and too much red tape.
Why introduce a tariff, if one cannot get it?
In Italy’s case, there is also an electricity monopoly. It didn’t want competition. Italy’s position as the world’s top 10 economies has gone and it is currently shrinking at 2.1% per annum and has growing unemployment, labour unrest and other problems. I believe this is because of narrow minded electricity thinking, and wanting the government to own and control everything instead of government providing the framework for competition and allowing private capital to be used to grow the economy. The government then collects taxation from a growing tax base and uses this for its infrastructure and other programmes, thus being able to grow and invest without debt.
Back to the City of Cape Town’s strategy: if you look at the graphs in section 1.2 you can see that we are currently 30% under our expected consumption. This because of massive efficiencies in households and businesses mainly due to electricity price increases and also solar water heaters, insulation, CFL lights, etc. Cape Town continues to grow fast, yet electricity supply is not growing. Yet we have been asked to save even more electricity. And what of the huge growth in electricity income for the City over the past 5 years? Where has this money gone? Why can’t the City implement its own Feed In Tariffs to make Cape Town a world class city? Cape Town will be the Design capital of the world in 2014, but we may just be the laughing stock of the world!
Part of the reason also stems from closing industries and the strikes which have the perverse effect of South Africa using less electricity.
And then if you look at 1.3, you see the words “where practical” and “finalization of national technical specifications” and “PPA’s with IPP’s” and nothing about residential and SMME roof top solar; nothing re Net Metering; nothing re Tariff Strategies for residential and SMME electricity users. Why not?
To my mind all this is geared to:
- keep the small producer out of the equation
- further delay the adoption of Renewable Energy (the government has been working on the specifications for a decade, yet there were companies reverse feeding the grid in the 1960’s without any “technical” problems)
- “where practical” means that no matter that Reverse Feed happens in millions of locations around the world, it is not practical in South Africa, which is fixated on the income it can derive from electricity pricing, and the number of jobs that can be created in the electricity sector, instead of realising that we need electricity to grow the economy and the money should come from taxation associated with corporation tax and employee tax.
Perhaps 100,000 jobs can be created in the electricity sector. But we have 25% unemployment and 500,000 new people in South Africa each year. We need to employ 11 million people in the next 10 years. Who cares how many people will be employed in the electricity sector! All that people should care about is the number of people who will be employed because we have electricity, ie the other 10.9 million people!!!
Furthermore in this section, we have the threat of Load Shedding and the request to switch off at peak times. Why should we do this? Switching off at peak times simply makes Eskom and the Cities richer without any benefit to the small users. Big users get paid to switch off and reduce load. Small users just get inconvenienced. It costs Eskom between R6 and R13 a kWh to run the diesel powered Ankerlig peaking power station near Atlantis, depending on who does the calculations.
This electricity is sold to the residential customer at R1.50 a kWh. Why not allow Time of Use Metering and Net Metering and residential customers could thereby be incentivised to feed the grid at peak times? How much better it would be for Eskom to pay private people R2.60 a kWh, which is the peak demand winter tariff? Everyone would actually be better off. At the moment, everyone, especially the South African economy, is worse off.
And the department is “in the process of establishing a smart meter pilot.” This pilot has been ongoing for years with no end in sight!! Why can’t we actually do things instead of talking and writing about them?
It is time to start producing electricity so that the economy can grow. Until this happens South Africa will continue to be the 37th fastest growing economy in Africa and one of the world’s poorest performing economies in an age of mass sustainable employment elsewhere in the world.