
A Tiger Fin Rock Cod at Sodwana in the Maputaland Marine Protected Area. Image: Bryan Hart
A new peer-reviewed study published in Science provides a novel scientific framework to consistently understand, plan, establish, evaluate and monitor ocean protection in Marine Protected Areas (MPAs).
Authored by 42 marine and social scientists from 38 institutions across six continents, The MPA Guide: A Framework to Achieve Global Goals for the Ocean enables the global community to advance understanding of ocean protection and achieve global goals to reverse biodiversity loss through MPAs.
The MPA Guide categorises each area according to four levels of protection - full, high, light or minimal - tracks whether protection has been activated in the water and matches both of those with the benefits the MPA can expect to deliver.
“The benefits from MPAs are key for our future. For the first time, The MPA Guide provides a way to track those benefits using a unified structure, shared language, and consistent approach. This will provide an evidence-based understanding of where we stand on ocean protection,” said Dr. Kirsten Grorud-Colvert, Associate Professor at Oregon State University and lead author of The MPA Guide. “With this clarity, we can monitor our global progress and identify the science-based actions required. We need to ensure MPAs are set up for success to safeguard our ocean and its benefits from the devastating consequences of human overuse.”

De Hoop Marine Protected Area. Image: Steve Benjamin
A culmination of a decade of inclusive, collaborative research involving hundreds of scientists and diverse stakeholders The MPA Guide comes at a key time as countries prepare to negotiate the target of protecting at least 30% the ocean by 2030 at the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) meeting in Kunming, China in 2022.
While MPAs are a central tool for ocean conservation, not all MPAs are the same. There are wide-ranging types of MPAs with various goals, regulations, and consequently, outcomes. This variety causes confusion. For example, some MPAs allow fishing, aquaculture, and anchoring, while others do not. Some MPAs are counted on paper but are not active in the ocean. In the absence of guidance on how to categorize MPAs or to determine their likely outcomes, there is considerable inconsistency. One result is a mismatch between what an MPA is expected to accomplish and the actual outcomes. A second result is the lack of a reliable way to monitor how much ocean is actually protected, leading to inaccurate numbers and disjointed understanding about how much protection actually exists worldwide.
By providing the science, evidence, and framework to categorise different types of MPAs and track their progress, The MPA Guide aims to equip all stakeholders with the tools and practical guidance they need to ensure MPAs are designed optimally to deliver on their goals; to conserve biodiversity and benefit people.

A black tip shark at the Aliwal Shoal Marine Protected Area. Image: Bryan Hart
There are four core components to The MPA Guide:
- Stages of Establishment specifies an MPA’s status – whether it only exists on paper or is in operation.
- Levels of Protection clarifies the degree to which biodiversity is protected from extractive or destructive activities.
- Enabling Conditions provide the principles and processes needed to plan, design and govern a successful MPA.
- Outcomes describe the conservation and social results that can be expected from an MPA at a particular stage and level, provided the enabling conditions are in place.
The MPA Guide will be continually tested and adjusted. National trials are already underway in France, Indonesia, and the United States of America, where MPA experts are using it to analyse and categorise existing MPAs so that communities and governments can make informed decisions.
“Because a holistic, inclusive, and integrated approach has been taken in devising this guide, we find we can readily apply it to our work. For us, the clarity that The MPA Guide provides really helps inform our work on MPAs in South Africa to best achieve the goals we have for our ocean. It looks to provide solutions that will last long into the future,” said Jean Harris of WILDOCEANS, a programme of the WILDTRUST in South Africa and co-author of the paper.
Practical trials are also being conducted to improve the transparency and understanding of MPA data globally. The UNEP-WCMC-Protected Planet team and other MPA Guide partners are working with a wide range of stakeholders to assess how The Guide can help resolve fundamental challenges in global MPA tracking and reporting, including how it can be integrated into reporting mechanisms for new MPAs.
“The MPA Guide has been designed to build on and complement existing systems, such as the IUCN Protected Area Categories,” said Dan Laffoley, co-author of the paper and Marine Vice Chair of IUCN’s World Commission on Protected Areas, a lead partner on The MPA Guide. “It fills in a complete picture of the protection that an MPA provides, which will be useful from local to global levels as countries scale up ocean protection.”
“The MPA Guide reflects a collective ambition to find unity in language and consistency in approach to conserving biodiversity in the global ocean. With it, we can bolster international dialogue and collaboration and provide the transparency we need to assess protected areas and ensure they are designed to deliver the best results for restoring biodiversity,” said Naomi Kingston, Head of Operations at the United Nations Environment Programme World Conservation Monitoring Centre (UNEP-WCMC), co-author of The MPA Guide and a lead partner of the initiative.
“If the global community can use it to scale up the level of protection, extent and effectiveness of MPAs, we can achieve our global ambition to conserve life in the ocean.”
Leave a Reply or Follow